A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million (approximately $1 billion AUD) in damages to Energy Transfer and its subsidiary, Dakota Access, following protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL).
The jury found Greenpeace USA liable on all counts, resulting in nearly $US404 million in damages.
Greenpeace Fund Inc. and Greenpeace International were deemed responsible for certain claims, each facing approximately $US131 million in penalties.
Energy Transfer hailed the decision as a victory for those who distinguish between lawful free speech and illegal activities.
The company asserted that Greenpeace’s actions extended beyond peaceful protest, alleging that the organization funded and trained protesters who disrupted local communities.
Stay up to date on the latest news with The National Briefing – keeping you in the loop with news as it hits:
The case stems from significant protests in 2016 and 2017 against DAPL’s construction near the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s reservation. The tribe opposed the pipeline, citing risks to their water supply.
Despite the protests, DAPL began operations in mid-2017, transporting about 5% of the United States’ daily oil production.
Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal the verdict.
Kristin Casper, Greenpeace International’s General Counsel stated, “The fight against Big Oil is not over today. We know that the law and the truth are on our side.”
The organisation also intends to pursue an anti-intimidation lawsuit against Energy Transfer in Amsterdam this July.
Founded in 1971 in Vancouver, Canada, Greenpeace has a history of environmental activism, including efforts to stop nuclear testing on Amchitka Island. Today, it operates in over 55 countries, focusing on preserving ecosystems and combating fossil fuel corporations through nonviolent actions.
The organisation is funded by individual contributions and foundation grants, refusing support from governments, corporations, or political parties.
The verdict raises concerns about the potential financial impact on Greenpeace and the broader implications for environmental activism. The organisation maintains that its mission will continue, emphasising their commitment to environmental protection and advocacy.